Dems. calling Obama incompetent!

Funny, as the Dims were complicit in creating this mess we're in!

  


.

Yes they were.  But now that they are scared they might not get reelected, they are backing away.

WHL wrote:"Forget for a moment that Republican outrage," said King on his CNN show this morning. "More and more Democrats in key 2014 races are calling for the president to get a spine, they say, and fire his Veterans Affairs secretary. And what more and more Democrats are saying privately is scathing, calling the president and his team detached, flat footed, even incompetent.

"Maggie Haberman," said King turning to a panelist, "that's what strikes me, what democrats are saying privately in the wakes of the healthcare.gov problems, they see a president who doesn't want to take command, doesn't want to act fast. Raising the competence question. Some Democrats, who believe in government, [are saying] this White House doesn't appear to have its hand on the lever."

Haberman of Politico agreed, cited more examples, and added: "All of this adds up to somebody who just doesn't seem at all involved."

I wonder if any of them will be called racists.         

Obama, is an eloquently tailored empty suit.

No resume
no accomplishments
no experience
no original ideas
no understanding of how the economy works
no understanding of how the world works

nothing but abstract, empty rhetoric devoid of real substance.

Actions always speak louder than words. A leaders actions will create respect from the opposition. Hate Reagan or love him, even his biggest naysayers respected him. Obama deflects, points fingers and feigns outrage, but in the end does very little to address the problems. He is a great speaker, it's a shame that those speeches were filled with so many lies that he couldn't escape.

Obama said he was going to fundamentally change America. The problem is…people were so easy to buy into the rhetoric they never bothered to ask what he meant.

Thankfully our representatives in congress are slowing him down.

Wow, you made so many good points in that post, Outer!   The Dems call the Repubs the party of no while their leader is the man of NO!!!    

I don't think a lot of people knew what he meant by fundamentally change and he didn't want them to know.  He does that kind of thing with his speech a lot-says something which sounds good but he really means something else.  Yes, thankfully the Reps are slowing him down-like they did Clinton.  Clinton's Presidency would have been a disaster also if the Dems had remained in power during his term because he, too, would have gotten all the liberal things he really wanted.