The Briefer In Chief.......
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
The Briefer In Chief.......
........tells us that Bush and Cheney cooked the information:
http://www.ifyouonlynews.com/videos/bushs-top-cia-briefer-bush-and-cheney-lied-to-the-public-about-iraq-war-video/
All of this as we think of all of our service men and ladies who died in Iraq:
http://www.ifyouonlynews.com/videos/bushs-top-cia-briefer-bush-and-cheney-lied-to-the-public-about-iraq-war-video/
All of this as we think of all of our service men and ladies who died in Iraq:
News Buzzard- Posts : 3091
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-02-01
MSNBC Pressed Very Hard to Get What Bill Clinton Repeated on a TV Broadcast...
News Buzzard wrote:........tells us that Bush and Cheney cooked the information:
http://www.ifyouonlynews.com/videos/bushs-top-cia-briefer-bush-and-cheney-lied-to-the-public-about-iraq-war-video/
All of this as we think of all of our service men and ladies who died in Iraq:
Was Morell employed by the CIA when Bill Clinton said the same thing?
.
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
Bill Clinton didn't say the same thing, and Bill Clinton wasn't marching us into a disaster of a war.
News Buzzard- Posts : 3091
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
News Buzzard wrote:Bill Clinton didn't say the same thing, and Bill Clinton wasn't marching us into a disaster of a war.
What isn't war-like in what Clinton said?
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
Once again you resort to diversion. Cheney said that Iraq had nukes and Morrell said that wasn't true. Why do you bring Clinton into the picture? He didn't have us over there for an 8 year disgrace!!
News Buzzard- Posts : 3091
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
Clinton ordered an invasion of Iraq because Hussein stopped letting UN inspectors in, but that invasion was never carried out when Hussein backed off.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/clintontext121698.htm
Cheney said that Hussein had nukes, and Morell said that was not true!
Bush and Cheney were also trying to sell us that Hussein was linked with Al Qaeda and was behind 9/11. More lies!!
I hope the Republicans try to argue the merits of the invasion of Iraq next year before the election. It will be at their own electoral peril!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/clintontext121698.htm
Cheney said that Hussein had nukes, and Morell said that was not true!
Bush and Cheney were also trying to sell us that Hussein was linked with Al Qaeda and was behind 9/11. More lies!!
I hope the Republicans try to argue the merits of the invasion of Iraq next year before the election. It will be at their own electoral peril!
News Buzzard- Posts : 3091
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
News Buzzard wrote:[/b] Why do you bring Clinton into the picture?
Because Clinton (both of them) insist on using the term "nuclear"?
(Underlined in red for your attention).
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
What don't you understand about Bush's CIA director telling Chris Matthews that Cheney lied to us??????
It's very difficult for Republicans to admit that they screwed up, so let them bring that narrative into the campaign next year. Hillary will wind up with 450 electoral votes.
It's very difficult for Republicans to admit that they screwed up, so let them bring that narrative into the campaign next year. Hillary will wind up with 450 electoral votes.
News Buzzard- Posts : 3091
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-02-01
I didn't See Where Morrel Folded...
I watched the interview. Chris Matthews brow-beat Morrel to the point that Morrel had to ask three times, "May I speak"?News Buzzard wrote:Cheney said that Hussein had nukes, and Morell said that was not true!
Morrel repeatedly defended his position that it was not his job to watch TV for MSNBC. The findings hadn't changed from when Clinton stated that Saddam had nukes, chemical, and biological weapons. (As above).
.
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
Of course Saddam had that stuff. He moved it before we invaded. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
WHL- Admin
- Posts : 6057
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-01-14
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
WHL wrote:Of course Saddam had that stuff. He moved it before we invaded. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
That's a great campaign plank for the Republicans next year!! They got nothing else!!!!!
News Buzzard- Posts : 3091
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
Oh, and I forgot to tell you: Hillary was born in Kenya!!!!
News Buzzard- Posts : 3091
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
WHL wrote:Of course Saddam had that stuff. He moved it before we invaded. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
Before the invasion, satellite imagery showed a stream of Russian trucks transporting suspected nuclear equipment to Syria. Now that Damascus is threatened by ISIS, we may know soon-enough!
.
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
That's right!! And there really is a Santa Claus and an Easter Bunny!!
News Buzzard- Posts : 3091
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: The Briefer In Chief.......
News Buzzard wrote:WHL wrote:Of course Saddam had that stuff. He moved it before we invaded. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
That's a great campaign plank for the Republicans next year!! They got nothing else!!!!!
Sounds a lot like Ms Clinton... lots of cricket sounding from her camp.
red_hill- Posts : 303
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2013-02-01
Obumbles Arms the Enemy...!
News Buzzard wrote:"...I hope the Republicans try to argue the merits of the invasion of Iraq next year before the election. It will be at their own electoral peril...!"
Obumbles said, "We now have a secure Iraq—when we didn't! Our gains to re-secure Iraq would involve Obama's criminal strategy of "doing nothing". We'd be fighting against an ISIS army that has recently become fully-equipped!
Although al-Abadi and other Iraqi and U.S. officials haven't attached a dollar sign to the lost weaponry and vehicles, a calculation of those losses follows:
•2,300 Humvee armored vehicles @ $70,000 per copy. Total: $16 million
•40 M1A1 Abram tanks @ $4.3 million per copy. Total: $172 million
•52 M198 Howitzer mobile gun systems @ $527,337 per copy. Total: $2.7 million
•74,000 Army machine guns @ $4,000 per copy. Total: $29 million
The grand total comes to $219.7 million, but experts say those losses represent a fraction of the many hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of U.S.-supplied military equipment that has fallen into ISIS's hands and is being used against the U.S. and allied forces on the ground in Iraq and neighboring Syria.
CNBC:
Where Obumbles is lacking is determination to hold the gains we had made at great cost.
Valerie Jarrett wants a dysfunctional Iraq to strengthen Iran's hand in Middle East religious zealotry—and Obumbles is seeing to it that a dysfunctional Iraq is the result.
.
Similar topics
» NSA spy chief to step down
» Examples of waste for
» "STUPID has a Commander-in-Chief"
» This Explains ISIS Dithering by Obama...
» It's the law of the land!!!
» Examples of waste for
» "STUPID has a Commander-in-Chief"
» This Explains ISIS Dithering by Obama...
» It's the law of the land!!!
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|