Islamic fundamentalists benefit from Obama's foreign policy

HOUSTON, September 6, 2013 – President Obama’s foreign policy decisions in Egypt, Libya and his current desire to start a war in Syria, continue to further the interests of Islamic fundamentalists.

Syria, Libya and Egypt were three of the very few remaining secular governments in the Mideast, prior to US interventions. Due to consequences flowing from Obama’s actions, all three will soon be governed by totalitarian Islamic fundamentalists.

Most Muslims consider the Quaran and the accompanying Hadiths the direct word of Allah, striving to follow that direction as closely as possible. The main goal of Islam, as established by these texts, is to establish a “caliphate,” or an Islamic world government based on Sharia law.

The Muslim Brotherhood, a very powerful group in the Mideast, is a constant player in the battles for control in Libya, Egypt and, now, Syria. Interestingly, the Brotherhood, whom President Obama, Sen. John McCain and many others have refererred to as moderate, has as it’s official credo, “Allah is our objective; the Quran is our law, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and dying in the way of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.”

Without any regard for the ruler or government that would follow, Obama has called for, and successfully deposed, leaders of Egypt and Libya, which were two of the most powerful secular forces in the Middle East.


Read more: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/time-choosing/2013/sep/6/islamic-fundamentalists-greatly-benefit-obamas-for/#ixzz2e93SIEVM
Follow us: @wtcommunities on Twitter

Anybody know if this is true?

What?

This is what I mean when I say that right wingers will say anything, true or not:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_state

He did ask if anyone knew if it was true or not!! And besides there are things that every one of us has posted that could or could not be true.

I stand by the Washington Times.

Although Obama has recently said he does not support regime change in Syria, this is a departure from previous calls for Bashar al-Assad, the President of Syria, to step down.

President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, Muammar Gaddafi of Libya, and now President Assad of Syria all showed little concern for the welfare of their citizens. President Obama knew this and acted on this knowledge in Egypt and Libya and has advocated for the same in Syria.

Both Libya and Egypt are, it could be argued, by every measure worse off today than they were before intervention. The Syrian situation is almost identical to that of Libya, except the international community is affirmatively against Obama entering the Syrian war.

In Egypt, President Mubarak was the keystone that kept the peace in the Middle East. Egypt is the strongest military power besides Israel in the region, and the fact that Mubarek unwaveringly abided by the Camp David Accords, where his predecessor and the prime minister of Israel agreed to a peace treaty, was more than enough to consider his leadership beneficial for American and Israeli security interests.

However, Obama was extremely vocal during the “Arab Spring” in 2011 in calling for a regime change and for Mubarak to step down paving way for the Muslim Brotherhood, by far the best financed and organized opposition group to Mubarak, to take power. This support was done knowing that the Muslim Brotherhood had planned to break the peace treaty with Israel if they were ever in power.


Read more: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/time-choosing/2013/sep/6/islamic-fundamentalists-greatly-benefit-obamas-for/#ixzz2e9ibBGUD
Follow us: @wtcommunities on Twitter

When Mubarak did step down, the Brotherhood candidate, Mohamed Morsi, as was widely expected, won the special election for President. He subsequently rammed through a Constitution based largely on Sharia law and without any input from the liberal opposition.
This, coupled with the Brotherhood’s relentless crackdown on dissent and religious freedom, resluted in protests that dwarfed those of Mubarak’s oppression.
In August of 2013, a Gallup poll of Egyptians found that a stunning 80% believed they were better off under Mubarak, before Obama’s intervention, than they are now.


Read more: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/time-choosing/2013/sep/6/islamic-fundamentalists-greatly-benefit-obamas-for/#ixzz2e9j1QiTS
Follow us: @wtcommunities on Twitter