Look Who Is Behind Schweizer........

.........It's none other than the Koch banditos!!!!!

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/fivepoints/peter-schweizer-clinton-cash-5-points

Who cares who is behind the book?

It appears that the book is in fact accurate as it pertains to this issue of obvious corruption by Bill & Hillary Clinton. The New York Times is not merely repeating what has been said in the book, it has built off the story with its own research.



Did you see how the Newsweek article starts out?

Hillary Clinton's Big Benefactor Has Trade Links with Iran

Enemies of Hillary Clinton waiting to discredit her bid for the White House are likely to seize on news that one of the biggest benefactors to the Clinton Foundation has been trading with Iran and may be in breach of US sanctions imposed on the country.

http://www.newsweek.com/2015/04/24/hillary-clinton-runs-white-house-and-row-over-ukrainian-benefactors-trade-322253.html

Newsweek qualifies their story by stating that US laws regarding the US sanctions on Iran are complex. In other words, this is a speculative hit job! I suspect that the NY Times and Newsweek are rooting for somebody else, other than Hillary, to be nominated. The good news is not one of your clowns could beat any Democrat!

News Buzzard wrote:Newsweek qualifies their story by stating that US laws regarding the US sanctions on Iran are complex. In other words, this is a speculative hit job! I suspect that the NY Times and Newsweek are rooting for somebody else, other than Hillary, to be nominated. The good news is not one of your clowns could beat any Democrat!

What happened to,

Hillary in 2016!

If you can't see my signature it might be time for a new pair of glasses!

News Buzzard wrote:Newsweek qualifies their story by stating that US laws regarding the US sanctions on Iran are complex. In other words, this is a speculative hit job! I suspect that the NY Times and Newsweek are rooting for somebody else, other than Hillary, to be nominated. The good news is not one of your clowns could beat any Democrat!

You must be joking. The NYT wants someone else? Who? Name one D that could win other than Hillary.

Elizabeth Warren could easily beat any of the Republican candidates, because they are a very weak crowd! The Republicans are really ticked because Hillary can match their cozy financial relationship with the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson with sugar daddys of her own. Are you telling me that we can't come up with the same circumstantial dirt on any one of them?? They're all connected to money trees, but I'm on board with keeping the Republicans out of the White House. That would be another disaster, just like Bush! In the end it's going to be Hillary in 2016.

Take a good look around the country, Red Hill. There are very few places as lilly white as New Hampshire and it's going to show in the election next year. That's just plain common sense!

red_hill wrote:

News Buzzard wrote:Newsweek qualifies their story by stating that US laws regarding the US sanctions on Iran are complex. In other words, this is a speculative hit job! I suspect that the NY Times and Newsweek are rooting for somebody else, other than Hillary, to be nominated. The good news is not one of your clowns could beat any Democrat!

You must be joking. The NYT wants someone else? Who? Name one D that could win other than Hillary.

Martin O'Malley has expressed interest in running for President. There's lots of time left.

Now O’Malley is the DGA’s finance chairman, a fundraising position that keeps him connected to the party’s major donors. He’s also a regular on national cable news and a speaker at Democratic fundraising dinners – including those in the early nominating states of Iowa and New Hampshire.  

News Buzzard wrote:If you can't see my signature it might be time for a new pair of glasses!

.