A Plurality and Power of Consent

News Hawk wrote:

obervantone wrote: You have at least two members on this forum that are advocating the overthrow of the United States of America, a question I asked directly and was answered in the affirmative.  I understand the First Amendment but I do not want to be a part of a forum in which such things are advocated.

Thanks you
Obervantone.

You disagree with The Founders?

"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive."
—Thomas Jefferson

  

Anti Federalist wrote:

News Hawk wrote:

obervantone wrote: You have at least two members on this forum that are advocating the overthrow of the United States of America, a question I asked directly and was answered in the affirmative.  I understand the First Amendment but I do not want to be a part of a forum in which such things are advocated.

Thanks you
Obervantone.

You disagree with The Founders?

"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive."
—Thomas Jefferson

  

Anti Federalist wrote:

News Hawk wrote:

obervantone wrote: You have at least two members on this forum that are advocating the overthrow of the United States of America, a question I asked directly and was answered in the affirmative. I understand the First Amendment but I do not want to be a part of a forum in which such things are advocated.

Thanks you
Obervantone.

You disagree with The Founders?

"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive."
—Thomas Jefferson

Won't be long before you'll be arrested for reading the Declaration of Independence.

Heard that. Standing up for the ideas contained within it and the reasons why it was and still is valid makes you and I as Americans, in the eyes of those running our government, domestic terrorists.
To be arrested for expressing such thoughts and beliefs is the next logical step.

Adolph Hitler was very astute in his understanding how valuable it was to have enemies and the political economy of using fear as a tool to control people. He stated it was inherently beneficial to his party's power and so very convenient to have a system of laws where everyone is a criminal.

I think obervantone and red_hill set out to change the narrative. I think they deliberately did so because for what ever motivation either have, views counter to theirs require use of various styles of personal attack or denigrating ideas to essentially dissuade or scare others from understanding and or believing the ideas of Liberty and self determination.

If you notice there was no effort of respectful discourse or reasoned argument on their part. It was attack and belittle the conversation and personally those taking part.

I don't believe either have honest intentions or views based on reason in regards to Liberty.

I think also, it is people such as obervantone and red_hill who contribute greatly to imposition of tyranny.
Those in power due to the overwhelming odds they face in repressing the vast numbers of Americans who may one day defy and revolt against them, require quislings and sycophants to undermine peoples beliefs in individuality and free thinking. Vladimir Lenin was a great proponent of useful idiots. He and Stalin used them to horrific bloody effect.

The smug attitude of obervantone and red_hill is to their great undoing. When tyrants are through with their useful dupes they usually are the first to be eliminated. See, inherent in their treason to their fellow countryman's liberty and freedoms, is reason they can never be trusted. They must go or be sacrificed in the ruthless cause of concentration of power.

Careful what you wish for and the law of unintended consequences.

If you study the nuts and bolts history of regimes through human history, whether they be fascist or communist, various dictatorships, always require willing lickspittles and useful dupes to perform a sundry of dirty social and cultural tricks to undermine, change, or obscure the truth about totalitarianism and it's actors.


As you said: "Won't be long before you'll be arrested for reading the Declaration of Independence."

"...Fear is the psychological weapon of choice for totalitarian systems of power. Make the people afraid. Get them to surrender their rights in the name of national security. And then finish off the few who aren’t afraid enough. If this law is not revoked we will be no different from any sordid military dictatorship. Its implementation will be a huge leap forward for the corporate oligarchs who plan to continue to plunder the nation and use state and military security to cow the population into submission. "

from: US Totalitarianism Loses Major Battle As Judge Permanently Blocks NDAA's Military Detention Provision
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/us-totalitarianism-loses-major-battle-judge-permanently-blocks-ndaas-military-detention-provisi


Personally I believe in the great nature of so many of my fellow American's.
That there are lots more good hearted moral principled people than there are bad and evil people.
I think we win the day. I think everything in it's own unique way is as it should be, that it all could not have happened any other way. That we will be tested to our souls and our faith. That it is an opportunity that comes only once in an age, where we get to finish what our founders began, and come better for it as a people and a republic, and realize our potential like never before.

Won't be long before you'll be arrested for reading the Declaration of Independence.

MtTopPatriot wrote:
Are you advocating the overthrow of the United States government?

There is no need of doing so, nor is there any profit in advocating something that will happen because millions of American's who care about their fellow American's and their Liberty are on the verge of uprising and changing the course of history again.
That's not as you said it, "overthrow of the US government." That's realignment and correction helping our government find it's legitimacy and lawful mandate. Just wondering.

News Hawk wrote:

obervantone wrote: You have at least two members on this forum that are advocating the overthrow of the United States of America, a question I asked directly and was answered in the affirmative.  I understand the First Amendment but I do not want to be a part of a forum in which such things are advocated.

Thanks you
Obervantone.

The next time you swig a pint of Sam Adams beer, think on Sam Adams' Counsel.

"If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.

May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."  
—Samuel Adams

  


.

MtTopPatriot wrote:

Wooo Hoo!
Whats next with your statist talking points after calling me trailer trash?
I'm a racist?
Domestic terrorist?
White supremacist?
Tea Bagger?
Conservative extremist?
You gonna have me SWATTED.
Report me to the obama regime?

red_hill wrote:You gonna have me SWATTED?

There is no such real term, except for the act of swatting a fly

Anti Federalist wrote:

red_hill wrote:You gonna have me SWATTED?

There is no such real term, except for the act of swatting a fly

Where have you been?

Swatting is the tricking of any emergency service (via such as a 9-1-1 dispatcher) into dispatching an emergency response based on the false report of an on-going critical incident. Episodes range from large to small, from the deployment of bomb squads, SWAT units and other police units and the concurrent evacuations of schools and businesses to a single fabricated police report meant to discredit an individual as a prank or personal vendetta. While it is a misdemeanor or a felony in every state in and of itself to report any untruth to law enforcement, swatting can cause massive disruption to the civil order and the public peace by the hoaxed deployment of police and other civic resources such as ambulances and fire departments. The term derives from SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics), a highly specialized type of police unit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting

red_hill wrote:

Anti Federalist wrote:

red_hill wrote:You gonna have me SWATTED?

There is no such real term, except for the act of swatting a fly

Where have you been?

Swatting is the tricking of any emergency service (via such as a 9-1-1 dispatcher) into dispatching an emergency response based on the false report of an on-going critical incident. Episodes range from large to small, from the deployment of bomb squads, SWAT units and other police units and the concurrent evacuations of schools and businesses to a single fabricated police report meant to discredit an individual as a prank or personal vendetta. While it is a misdemeanor or a felony in every state in and of itself to report any untruth to law enforcement, swatting can cause massive disruption to the civil order and the public peace by the hoaxed deployment of police and other civic resources such as ambulances and fire departments. The term derives from SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics), a highly specialized type of police unit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting

I've been around

I know how it is used... and would love to know how the OP thought I was going to SWAT him, an anonymous internet poster.

red_hill wrote:

MtTopPatriot wrote:

Wooo Hoo!
Whats next with your statist talking points after calling me trailer trash?
I'm a racist?
Domestic terrorist?
White supremacist?
Tea Bagger?
Conservative extremist?
You gonna have me SWATTED.
Report me to the obama regime?

My answers in italics
I'm a racist? I don't know you, I have no idea
Domestic terrorist? I don't know you, I have no idea
White supremacist? I don't know you, I have no idea
Tea Bagger? I don't know you, I have no idea
Conservative extremist?I don't know you, I have no idea
You gonna have me SWATTED.There is no such real term, except for the act of swatting a fly
Report me to the obama regime? For what?

I think you are a long winded (I think you need to learn that you will do better with brevity online), pseudo-intellectual with a thin skin.

Just so we are super clear- I don't give two shits what you think of me nor will I engage in any type of intelligent discourse with someone who loses his temper such as you. I don't care if you want to bring my moniker up in your ramblings. I don't care if you build a mountain top bunker and prep your ass off. Now run along and have some internet fights with others that don't have the time or interest to read and try to decipher your bullshit.

red_hill wrote:You're  

Have a great weekend in the bunker- I'll be out boating!