The "Gentle Giant" Who Caused Rioting in Missouri.

.

That said, the cop that shot him did not know he was a robbery suspect.

Of course, this is now such a cluster f*ck, that nobody will ever know for sure what happened.

Which is just what TPTB want, everybody back in their corners and not asking serious questions about why unarmed men are getting shot by cops, and why, when people protest this, the police response is to turn Mid City USA into Fallujah.

Noted "left wing radical" Mike Huckabee speaks out against militarized police.

Take note cops, when you start losing the "law and order" conservative crowd like Huck, well, then, you've got nobody in your corner.

Come about, there be rocks and shoals ahead.

Anti Federalist wrote:That said, the cop that shot him did not know he was a robbery suspect.

Of course, this is now such a cluster f*ck, that nobody will ever know for sure what happened.

Which is just what TPTB want, everybody back in their corners and not asking serious questions about why unarmed men are getting shot by cops, and why, when people protest this, the police response is to turn Mid City USA into Fallujah.

1) That "unarmed man" weighed 290 pounds, could have been a successful linebacker, but chose to strike a police officer and broke the officer's skull at the eye. The officer was justified in "stopping" the assault—using deadly force.

2) Much is being made of this because the "story" (which it is) will affect the election turnout in November. President Hussein even directed Eric Holder to go to the scene to make a bigger "splash".

3) There were three autopsies, and none described any wounds to the back of the suspect, as was described by "witnesses".

  



.

News Hawk wrote:1) That "unarmed man" weighed 290 pounds, could have been a successful linebacker, but chose to strike a police officer and broke the officer's skull at the eye. The officer was justified in "stopping" the assault—using deadly force.

Those reports of a broken skull are now being reported as false.

http://www.vox.com/xpress/2014/8/21/6054237/source-to-cnn-darren-wilson-didnt-have-a-fractured-eye-socket

2) Much is being made of this because the "story" (which it is) will affect the election turnout in November. President Hussein even directed Eric Holder to go to the scene to make a bigger "splash".

Of course, race hustling, as I already mentioned.

3) There were three autopsies, and none described any wounds to the back of the suspect, as was described by "witnesses".

Cops are notoriously bad shots.

Anti Federalist wrote:

News Hawk wrote:1) That "unarmed man" weighed 290 pounds, could have been a successful linebacker, but chose to strike a police officer and broke the officer's skull at the eye. The officer was justified in "stopping" the assault—using deadly force.

Those reports of a broken skull are now being reported as false.

http://www.vox.com/xpress/2014/8/21/6054237/source-to-cnn-darren-wilson-didnt-have-a-fractured-eye-socket

All I've seen that isn't so-called "eye-witness" testimony, is that the prosecutor hasn't received the medical records as yet.

Talk that the X-rays turned out "negative" hasn't come from a radiologist.

Besides that, ALL X-rays are negatives!

  


.