Crooked Clintons?

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100231113/the-new-york-times-takes-down-the-clinton-foundation-this-could-be-

The NY TIMES????

I've clicked on it to read it; however, all you need to do is google "Cattle-Futures" and "Clinton", and you'll see enough to convince you of the corruption in the "Clinton Dynasty".

Mr. Clinton earned $17 million from speeches last year. Hilliary is on her way to making the same amount.

Don't you wish you were disliked that much.

We can only dream about how successful the Clintons are.

Now go back to your 9 to 5 job and keep slamming the Clintons, they need the money you bring in for them.

I know he makes tons making speeches. And they are so poor they needed others to buy a house for them. Do they NEVER stop taking??

WHL wrote:I know he makes tons making speeches.  And they are so poor they needed others to buy a house for them.  Do they NEVER stop taking??

No, and why should they.

You can hate them all you want, but if they were republicans you would be cheering them on. It's only because they are liberal that you hate them so much.

I met Bill and Hilliary when he first ran for president and we talked for about ten minutes. He is the most likable guy you would ever want to meet.

He is well respected all around the world.

I agree, he is likable. That doesn't make him honest or honorable. I would not be cheering them on if they were Republicans with liberal beliefs.

The Mafia's Meyer Lansky was "likeable".

Donzel wrote:Mr. Clinton earned $17 million from speeches last year. Hilliary is on her way to making the same amount.

Canadians say,

1) Only in America could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at
a $35,000 a plate campaign fund raising event.

The Canadian reports seem to have it together, don't they?

Did you hear it on the news about the Clinton's problems?? Although I am sure THEY don't see it as a problem. They could care if they are in debt or their funds are in debt or anything. They will just go on livin' the life.