Re: IRS targets Conservatives

fshnski Fri May 24, 2013 9:54 am

I stand by what I said.

Outerlimits Fri May 24, 2013 9:56 am

Pigeon,

Let me make sure I have this straight.

You have your beak out of shape because you think the moderation is one sided?

Have you had your posts scrubbed? Have you had your opinions removed?

No?

Then why do you keep demanding these actions against others? There is no doubt there have been some derogatory statements by both sides. The difference is only one side is asking the other to be silenced.

Somehow I believe your outrage is just a bit…hypocritical.

Hear are a few of YOUR greatest hits.

News Pigeon wrote:More insults from the oh so nice people on this forum...all smack no fact!!!!

News Pigeon wrote:It just shows how the TEA-baggers want nothing more than total annihilation of our government

News Pigeon wrote:Really...who are you Clio The Psychic

News Pigeon wrote:Republicans are so pathetically hateful & really kind of stupid

News Pigeon wrote:These jokers will soon resort to tinfoil beanies to ward off the little green goblins that Obama has unleashed on the country

News Pigeon wrote:The TEA-baggers are calling for imprisonment/impeachment

News Pigeon wrote:...what a load of bovine excretion.

News Pigeon wrote:Life is harder when they're stupid!

News Pigeon wrote:let me rephrase that question so you might understand

News Pigeon wrote:much less hyperbole by a few bitter losers/haters/conspiracy fanatics

News Pigeon wrote:...it's really quite a shame that they would be so narrow minded, it's like something you would expect out of Mississippians not New Hampshire.

News Pigeon wrote:I am profanely bigoted towards people who embrace ignorance...that's what I was referring to as characteristic of swampwater MississippiansI could care less what a person of your caliber thinks about me or anything else for that matter

News Pigeon wrote:...you've already proven unworthy of any consideration when you refused to back-up your bitching.

News Pigeon wrote:I actually question your age or if you're even old enough to be allowed the unsupervised use of a computer.

News Pigeon wrote:As I said, they've got no political record to run on so they fling shit at the wall and hope something will stick....good luck losers

News Pigeon wrote:it's really quite easy to see why you want the good name of Wolfeboro removed from this forum...one would be hard-pressed to find anything good about your area IF it were judged by the antics of these loons

News Buzzard Fri May 24, 2013 10:27 am

"We've witnessed American voter fraud on a historical scale!" Laughing

That is so funny! You folks should get out of New Hampshire a little more often!! afro

fshnski Fri May 24, 2013 10:40 am

Good job OL. Thanks for taking the time to prove your point.

News Hawk Fri May 24, 2013 10:56 am

fshnski wrote:Good job OL.

I guess he's not on dial-up. tongue

Now, back to the subject, which was...

I forgot...

fshnski Fri May 24, 2013 11:34 am

It's probably just as well.

**WHL** Fri May 24, 2013 12:27 pm

WEll, we could ban those that don't agree with us and that slam us constantly (and then say we slam them), but what fun would that be? As long as it doesn't get too nasty, I think we should let them have their fun attacking us. Just my vote.

News Pigeon Fri May 24, 2013 1:13 pm

You know Outerlimits, I could do the same search on you, & others, to prove my point but it's not worth my time...and it would be ignored anyway.
We can just agree that we will never agree on most issues..

fshnski Fri May 24, 2013 1:26 pm

I don't agree with that statement.

Outerlimits Fri May 24, 2013 3:25 pm

News Pigeon wrote:You know Outerlimits, I could do the same search on you, & others, to prove my point but it's not worth my time...and it would be ignored anyway.
We can just agree that we will never agree on most issues..

You know what Pigeon…you could, but that would be pointless because you missed the point.

I said there were certainly negative posts on both sides…but only one side was crying foul.

You were calling for moderation.

It appears one of many differences we have is you want to silence opposition. I do not. I may not agree with a word you say, but strongly believe you have every right to speak your mind.

I applaud WHL for not scrubbing your posts (or anyone’s posts).

News Hawk Fri May 24, 2013 4:09 pm

Outerlimits wrote:"...I applaud WHL for not scrubbing your posts (or anyone’s posts)..."

OL, with NB "moderating", you missed one heck of a Wolfeboro forum!

Surprised

News Buzzard Fri May 24, 2013 4:32 pm

News Hawk wrote:
Outerlimits wrote:"...I applaud WHL for not scrubbing your posts (or anyone’s posts)..."
OL, with NB "moderating", you missed one heck of a Wolfeboro forum!

You were the reason I took the moderating job. Our administrator, Lugnut, couldn't take you anymore and was threatening to shut down part of the forum. You were also the reason another recent Wolfeboro forum was shut down. I joined Big E's forum because I knew he wouldn't take your shit!

News Hawk Fri May 24, 2013 5:00 pm

News Buzzard wrote:"...We are dealing with a very frustrated group of individuals who lost the election..."

Not exactly...

When an agency of the US Government targets "people saying the 'wrong' things",
we have Tyranny.

IRS targets Conservatives - Page 4 182386_10151279623269637_1286584834_n

IRS targets Conservatives - Page 4 182386_10151279623269637_1286584834_n

IRS targets Conservatives - Page 4 ?view=att&th=13edb6a81a440794&attid=0

IRS targets Conservatives - Page 4 ?view=att&th=13ed93440bdb14f8&attid=0

...and speaking of "American Imperialism"...:

"The People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s official newspaper, has published an article arguing that China has a claim to the Ryukyu Island chain, which includes Okinawa – home to major U.S. air force and marine bases and 1.3 million people. The Ryukyus were a “vassal state” that paid tribute to Chinese emperors until Japan annexed the islands in 1879, the article claims. “Unresolved problems relating to the Ryukyu Islands have reached the time for reconsideration,” it said, citing post-World War II declarations that required Japan to return Chinese territory."
—AFPC China Reform Monitor

fshnski Fri May 24, 2013 5:06 pm

I sort of agree with your statement but I think the image goes too far.

News Buzzard Fri May 24, 2013 5:26 pm

He made my case!

News Hawk Fri May 24, 2013 5:28 pm

Always happy to oblige.
Very Happy

fshnski wrote:I sort of agree with your statement but I think the image goes too far.

'Think we've seen the full expanse of this administration's intimidation tactics? Question

fshnski Fri May 24, 2013 5:31 pm

Sponsored content