Exactly What Did The IRS Want To Know

fshnski wrote:Do you read what you posts first.

Do you read what you post first?

Thank you.

Do you read what you post first?!

fshnski wrote:

Do you read what you posts first. You embarrass me and this site! I thought people of the left were past using race to improve their agenda.

I could care less what a person of your caliber thinks about me or anything else for that matter...you've already proven unworthy of any consideration when you refused to back-up your bitching. I actually question your age or if you're even old enough to be allowed the unsupervised use of a computer.

News Pigeon wrote:

fshnski wrote:

Do you read what you posts first. You embarrass me and this site! I thought people of the left were past using race to improve their agenda.

I could care less what a person of your caliber thinks about me or anything else for that matter...you've already proven unworthy of any consideration when you refused to back-up your bitching. I actually question your age or if you're even old enough to be allowed the unsupervised use of a computer.

How to win friends and influence people.

There is nothing so dangerous as people that are too confident in their incompetency.

... and noisy.

fshnski wrote:What surprises me is the people that care more about their agenda than they do our country.

...and MH wondered why there were no Republican candidates coming forward.

The Marxists know how to play a Democratic Republic.

Over the last two years, government watchdog groups filed more than a dozen complaints with the Internal Revenue Service seeking inquiries into whether large nonprofit organizations like those founded by the Republican political operative Karl Rove and former Obama administration aides had violated their tax-exempt status by spending tens of millions of dollars on political advertising.

The I.R.S. never responded.

During the same period, the agency singled out dozens of Tea Party-inspired groups that had applied for I.R.S. recognition, officials acknowledged on Friday, subjecting them to rounds of detailed questioning about their political activities. None of those groups were big spenders on political advertising; most were local Tea Party organizations with shoestring budgets.

For the I.R.S.’s bipartisan legion of critics, the agency’s record has underscored its contradictory and seemingly confused response to the fastest-growing corner in the world of unlimited political spending: tax-exempt groups that have paid for at least half a billion dollars in campaign ads during the last two election cycles.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/us/politics/irs-ignored-complaints-on-political-spending-by-big-tax-exempt-groups-watchdog-groups-say.html?ref=politics&_r=0

There's a good comment at the bottom of the article that the 501 (c) 4 section should be abolished, and end the tax deductions for all political organizations.

A congressman from Texas today stated to Attorney General Holder that one of the principle persons at the IRS lied to Congress, so now everybody at the IRS will lawyer up and take the fifth amendment. (That was probably gonna happen anyway)

We are going to trust the IRS to police Obamacare?????!!!

WHL wrote:We are going to trust the IRS to police Obamacare?????!!!

Not to worry .

I have it on good authority that the IRS scandal was committed by "Low-level" employees"

Well, THAT seemed to shut up the News Crows...

...too bad, I got 'nother ready to go...