Benghazi info released.

It had been secret. Let's see if it is still a phony scandal.

I wonder.

fshnski wrote:It had been secret. Let's see if it is still a phony scandal.

But it's not Friday!

  


.

News Hawk wrote:

fshnski wrote:It had been secret. Let's see if it is still a phony scandal.

But it's not Friday!

  


.

Good observation.

Yeah, what's up with that?

Good question.

You are making me laugh.

WHL wrote:You are making me laugh.

You make me laugh also.

Achigan wrote:

News Hawk wrote:

fshnski wrote:It had been secret. Let's see if it is still a phony scandal.

But it's not Friday!

  


.

Good observation.

Friday is Obama's "Bad-News-Dump" Day.

  


.

Everybody needs a "Dump" day, good or bad.

The newly released information on Benghazi greatly undermines FOX News:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/13/declassified-transcripts-undermine-foxs-benghaz/197572

End of "scandal"

News Buzzard wrote:The newly released information on Benghazi greatly undermines FOX News:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/13/declassified-transcripts-undermine-foxs-benghaz/197572

End of "scandal"

This is so typical of the right wing media and republicans. Just pick out what they want and ignore the real facts. They don't even know what they reported and as the article states: "ignored that the transcripts debunk some of the network's own favorite myths about the attack". The right wingers on this forum do the same thing. It's really getting worse and the average citizen is getting sick of it and it will show in future elections.

Thanks for posting NB

Nice blog Buzzard.  Completely devoid of the facts but then again…that is what you do.
You found the ONE blog that supports your Messiah.

There is absolutely no other honest way to describe the statements made by Obama, Hillary and Rice regarding the 9/11/12 attack on the Benghazi compound that resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, and three other American’s. They lied, straight up, bald faced, with 100% full knowledge and willing forethought of malice.

This is not speculation, not wishful thinking, not tin-foil hat conspiracy theory material, it is 100% documented fact from declassified top secret documents.

READ THEM YOURSELF.

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/press-releases?ContentRecord_id=17D69AFC-744A-43DA-8BEA-D582975C1277


Or try these:

New Declassified Docs Expose Obama’s Benghazi Lies
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/site/article/new-declassified-docs-expose-obamas-benghazi-lies

The Benghazi Transcripts: Top Defense officials briefed Obama on ‘attack,’ not video or protest
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/14/benghazi-transcripts-top-defense-officials-briefed-obama-on-attack-not-video-or/

New Declassified Docs Expose Obama’s Benghazi Lies
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/arnold-ahlert/new-declassified-docs-expose-obamas-benghazi-lies/

Benghazi Transcripts: Obama Briefed on 'Attack' Not Demonstration
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/benghazi-attack-obama-transcripts/2014/01/14/id/546931

White House Benghazi Attack Talking Points Edited
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/benghazi-news-attack-talking-points-cia-edited-white-19149423

Attack the messenger, Outerlimits! That's what you do best. Why don't you just single out one of your attachments, including page and number, that shows that either Obama or Hillary was lying! I would think by now that your hero, career criminal Darrell Issa, would have done that already. Is it difficult for you to be scratching at thin air?

Moved

News Buzzard wrote:Why don't you just single out one of your attachments, including page and number, that shows that either Obama or Hillary was lying!

Start Reading on page 48.

OBAMA, HILLARY and RICE LIED.

http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=AAEBCAA5-4C8F-4820-BACD-2DB9B53C3424

Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, a first-term lawmaker with experience as an Iraq war veteran and Army reserve officer, pressed Ham further on the point, prodding the 29-year Army veteran to admit that “the nature of the conversation” he had with Panetta and Dempsey was that “this was a terrorist attack.”

DR. WENSTRUP: “As a military person, I am concerned that someone in the military would be advising that this was a demonstration. I would hope that our military leadership would be advising that this was a terrorist attack.”

HAM: “Again, sir, I think, you know, there was some preliminary discussion about, you know, maybe there was a demonstration. But I think at the command, I personally and I think the command very quickly got to the point that this was not a demonstration, this was a terrorist attack.”

WENSTRUP: “And you would have advised as such if asked. Would that be correct?”

HAM: “Well, and with General Dempsey and Secretary Panetta, that is the nature of the conversation we had, yes, sir.”

Panetta told the Senate Armed Services Committee in February of last year that it was him who informed the president that “there was an apparent attack going on in Benghazi.” “Secretary Panetta, do you believe that unequivocally at that time we knew that this was a terrorist attack?” asked Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla. “There was no question in my mind that this was a terrorist attack,” Panetta replied.

Senior State Department officials who were in direct, real-time contact with the Americans under assault in Benghazi have also made clear they, too, knew immediately — from surveillance video and eyewitness accounts — that the incident was a terrorist attack. After providing the first substantive “tick-tock” of the events in Benghazi, during a background briefing conducted on the evening of Oct. 9, 2012, a reporter asked two top aides to then-Secretary Clinton: “What in all of these events that you’ve described led officials to believe for the first several days that this was prompted by protests against the video?”

“That is a question that you would have to ask others,” replied one of the senior officials. “That was not our conclusion.”

You have supported Obama and his version of the events that took place, before, during, and after Benghazi. Can you still hold that train of thought when handed the proof Obama, Hillary and Rice have been lying the entire time about what they knew about Benghazi and when they knew it?

News Buzzard wrote:"...Why don't you just single out one of your attachments, including page and number, that shows that either Obama or Hillary was lying!

How about a HISTORY of LYING, by a different messenger?

Jerry Zeifman, who said he is a lifelong Democrat, was a supervisor for 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. When the investigation was complete, Zeifman said he fired Hillary and refused to give her a recommendation.

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality..."
http://downtrend.com/robertgehl/while-on-watergate-committee-hillary-was-fired-for-lying-unethical-behavior/?utm_source=Outbrain

fshnski wrote:It had been secret. Let's see if it is still a phony scandal.

According to News Buzzard, they've "fixed" it.




.



.

Outerlimits... In what you posted and from what you wanted me to read, I don't see where the President lied or anybody else did.

Could you post something with a timeline that anyone lied.  Something with actual statements and then backup that they lied.

Achigan wrote:Outerlimits...  In what you posted and from what you wanted me to read, I don't see where the President lied or anybody else did.

Could you post something with a timeline that anyone lied.  Something with actual statements and then backup that they lied.

He won't be able to do it, Achigan. He tells you to start on page 48 in a document that has 156 pages. I would like to see the page that has the smoking gun! It looks like Darrell Issa hasn't found it yet! Obama said the next day that it was an act of terror, and now it looks like Al Qaeda wasn't even involved.

News Buzzard wrote: He won't be able to do it, Achigan. He tells you to start on page 48 in a document that has 156 pages. I would like to see the page that has the smoking gun!

It is on page 48.  

I even quoted the material here, Yet once again PROOF is not PROOF in your eyes.  You can’t possibly be that obtuse.  

Intelligence reported in real time there was no “protest about a video” and it was a terrorist attack.  Obama lied when he said it was a video that caused this.  Hillary lied when she said it didn’t matter and Rice lied on every Sunday morning talk-show. They all new the truth in real time.  General Ham told them during the attack.

News Buzzard wrote: and now it looks like Al Qaeda wasn't even involved.

Oh really?  You are a fountain of misinformation.

Senator Feinstein (D) had ZERO comments about the New York Times whitewash of Clinton & Obama last month when the article was published.

Suddenly - now that the Closed Door transcripts (the one's you won't read) of the meeting that SHE chaired have come out ...Senator Feinstein is singing like a bird in a CYA announcement.

The House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Mike Rogers (R-Michigan) and the leading Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) -- both issued statements the day the New York Times article was published that it was "wrong". I guess it’s good news that Senator Feinstein finally stepped up to the plate.

When will you?

A Feinstein spokesman said that the Hill's characterization of what Senator Feinstein said was overstated:

http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-east-north-africa/195327-feinstein-rejects-nyt-on-benghazi

Feinstein said that groups "loosely" associated with al Qaeda were responsible. That's really singing like a canary!!      

Keep fishing! You might come up with something over the next 3 years!  

I still don't see proof that anyone lied.

Confusion yes...statements that later came out that made the event more clear, yes...but lies from anyone is just not proven by anything that I have read here or anywhere else.
IMO the right wing wants to make our President look like a terrible person who doesn't have any feelings for his fellow American and the sacrifices that they make for us. I can't change that and I know outerlimits is reading this and thinks that I am a fool because I don't think the way he does about this.

What I believe is that President Obama is very upset that people get killed defending and representing this country. I also believe that President Bush felt the same way. We can read and interpret what we want and that's OK, but until someone shows me that anyone intentionally lied about the death of any American then I will just believe that they didn't do it.

Now go ahead and call me what you want...obtuse wasn't too bad.

Achigan wrote:"...IMO the right wing wants to make our President look like a terrible person who doesn't have any feelings for his fellow Americans.."

Obama has feelings for his fellow-believers:

"I will stand with the Muslims"


.

News Buzzard wrote:"...Keep fishing! You might come up with something over the next 3 years!   ..."

  

The fishing's been pretty good:

Don't forget that Mrs. Rodham-Clinton* (born in 1947) claimed to have been named after the late Sir Edmond Hillary—who climbed Mt. Everest in 1953, and was unheard of until that time.

  


.