Doctors Begin To Refuse Obamacare Patients

And let's see who runs in the Rep. party before we start calling him/her a bozo! Really, is that all you Dems. have, is name calling?

Bozo is about as toxic as moonbats! Who likes to use that word?

Seems like Rand Paul is your front-runner of the month...could someone tell me why he ran like a little girl when the "dreamers" approached the issue of immigration reform?

You know he wanted to finish that burger!!   

News Buzzard wrote:The Labor Force Participation Rate is a little higher than the last 60 year average:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/labor-force-participation-rate

So what's your point?

You’re joking right?

“The Labor Force Participation Rate is a little higher than the last 60 year average”

Fact: The Labor Participation Rate is the LOWEST it has been in 35 years.

Almost half of your sample size (60 years) happens to include an era when the majority of Americans families were single income. Women were just beginning to enter the (paid) workforce during the 60s and 70s.

It’s a full time job just trying to stop Liberals from moving the goalposts.

Outerlimits wrote:

News Buzzard wrote:The Labor Force Participation Rate is a little higher than the last 60 year average:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/labor-force-participation-rate

So what's your point?

You’re joking right?
 

“The Labor Force Participation Rate is a little higher than the last 60 year average”

Fact: The Labor Participation Rate is the LOWEST it has been in 35 years.

Almost half of your sample size (60 years) happens to include an era when the majority of Americans families were single income.  Women were just beginning to enter the (paid) workforce during the 60s and 70s.

It’s a full time job just trying to stop Liberals from moving the goalposts.

Thank you- I am on the road, but will post a telling graphic (unlike the one posted above)

Outerlimits wrote:

News Buzzard wrote:The Labor Force Participation Rate is a little higher than the last 60 year average:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/labor-force-participation-rate

So what's your point?

You’re joking right?
 

“The Labor Force Participation Rate is a little higher than the last 60 year average”

Fact: The Labor Participation Rate is the LOWEST it has been in 35 years.

Almost half of your sample size (60 years) happens to include an era when the majority of Americans families were single income.  Women were just beginning to enter the (paid) workforce during the 60s and 70s.

It’s a full time job just trying to stop Liberals from moving the goalposts.

Love your last sentence! It sure is the truth!

About half of the drop in labor force participation since 2007 is a result of the Baby Boomers retiring:

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/07/17/baby-boomers-are-a-big-part-of-labor-participation-rate-decline

US businesses have added 1.4 million jobs this year, the best 6 months since 1990!

News Buzzard wrote:About half of the drop in labor force participation since 2007 is a result of the Baby Boomers retiring:

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/07/17/baby-boomers-are-a-big-part-of-labor-participation-rate-decline

US businesses have added 1.4 million jobs this year, the best 6 months since 1990!

Excuses, excuses... retired or were pushed out the door???

[url=][/url]

red_hill wrote:Excuses, excuses... retired or were pushed out the door???

The article I posted said retired, and you posted the same graph that I did. So, we had the worst downturn since the Great Depression and the Baby Boomers are reaching retirement age. That doesn't take away from the fact that we've averaged a job growth of over 200 thousand jobs a month for the last 6 months and the economy is getting better. You just don't want to give Obama an inch. That's OK because he won!!