Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
+3
News Pigeon
WHL
News Hawk
7 posters
Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
First one at Noon paused to counsel a teen on a SUP that he needed a PFD while "operating" his SUP. (As a "vessel"). The teen was trying to climb back on his board.
As the "Law" passed by, I waved and got a wave in return.
Later, around 4-PM, a black, red and white GFBL cruised into Winter Harbor, turned around and "put the pedal to the metal". He suddenly slowed, and the reason was, he was headed directly towards the SECOND NHMP boat!
I couldn't see if a "conversation" followed, but he'll probably be more observant next time.
.
As the "Law" passed by, I waved and got a wave in return.
Later, around 4-PM, a black, red and white GFBL cruised into Winter Harbor, turned around and "put the pedal to the metal". He suddenly slowed, and the reason was, he was headed directly towards the SECOND NHMP boat!
I couldn't see if a "conversation" followed, but he'll probably be more observant next time.
.
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
I would say it was the first one came right in and right up to a boat that was moored. I don't even know if he spoke to him but MP left and the guy moved the boat maybe 50 feet from where he was. If the two things were related I don't know.
WHL- Admin
- Posts : 6057
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-01-14
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
Why do I have this mental picture of two old yentas bitching about those who are just trying to enjoy life.....life that has simply passed them by!
News Pigeon- Posts : 622
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
Another Saturday, and Zero NHMPs today!
A MONSTER of a powerboat came by, towing a tube. I'm sure the NHMP would have directed him to "wider-waters", where his mass would affect fewer people, and lessen shoreline erosion.
.
A MONSTER of a powerboat came by, towing a tube. I'm sure the NHMP would have directed him to "wider-waters", where his mass would affect fewer people, and lessen shoreline erosion.
.
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
was the monster150' from shore, docks, and other boats?News Hawk wrote:Another Saturday, and Zero NHMPs today!
A MONSTER of a powerboat came by, towing a tube. I'm sure the NHMP would have directed him to "wider-waters", where his mass would affect fewer people, and lessen shoreline erosion.
.
red_hill- Posts : 303
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
Because you're right!News Pigeon on Sun Aug 10, 2014 8:01 am
+
----
-
Laughing Why do I have this mental picture of two old yentas bitching about those who are just trying to enjoy life.....life that has simply passed them by!
by red_hill on Sun Aug 17, 2014 10:52 am
News Hawk wrote:Another Saturday, and Zero NHMPs today!
A MONSTER of a powerboat came by, towing a tube. I'm sure the NHMP would have directed him to "wider-waters", where his mass would affect fewer people, and lessen shoreline erosion.
was the monster150' from shore, docks, and other boats?
He reminds me of that old lady that used to rap on the windows of her house and yell at the kids to get off the street in front of her house.
I just spent 9 days at the lake in one of the busiest parts for boating...I have to say I did not see a single boat even close to violating RSA 270 D:2 X. I also only saw three MP Patrol Boats in total for the entire time I was up there and on the water. What was it that that State Rep said,....a solution in search of a problem....
I know I will regret this question but I will ask anyway. APS what is a "MONSTER of a powerboat"? Brand, size and speed is what I am looking for, not a general BS answer that you are noted for and if the MONSTER powerboat was violating the law or not, and if it was what action did you take?
obervantone- Posts : 717
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-04-10
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
That's like asking what an "oversized" boat is...obervantone wrote:Because you're right!News Pigeon on Sun Aug 10, 2014 8:01 am
+
----
-
Laughing Why do I have this mental picture of two old yentas bitching about those who are just trying to enjoy life.....life that has simply passed them by!by red_hill on Sun Aug 17, 2014 10:52 am
News Hawk wrote:Another Saturday, and Zero NHMPs today!
A MONSTER of a powerboat came by, towing a tube. I'm sure the NHMP would have directed him to "wider-waters", where his mass would affect fewer people, and lessen shoreline erosion.
was the monster150' from shore, docks, and other boats?
He reminds me of that old lady that used to rap on the windows of her house and yell at the kids to get off the street in front of her house.
I just spent 9 days at the lake in one of the busiest parts for boating...I have to say I did not see a single boat even close to violating RSA 270 D:2 X. I also only saw three MP Patrol Boats in total for the entire time I was up there and on the water. What was it that that State Rep said,....a solution in search of a problem....
I know I will regret this question but I will ask anyway. APS what is a "MONSTER of a powerboat"? Brand, size and speed is what I am looking for, not a general BS answer that you are noted for and if the MONSTER powerboat was violating the law or not, and if it was what action did you take?
red_hill- Posts : 303
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2013-02-01
Not JUST Erosion, But a Danger to Paddlers...
red_hill wrote:was the monster 150' from shore, docks, and other boats?News Hawk wrote:Another Saturday, and Zero NHMPs today!
A MONSTER of a powerboat came by, towing a tube. I'm sure the NHMP would have directed him to "wider-waters", where his mass would affect fewer people, and lessen shoreline erosion.
I watched from shore, so I couldn't tell. There was no NHMP to direct him away.
How is erosion affected by the 150' rule?
One hundred fifty feet (150') only means there are is a hazard of rocks near shore, and not meant to lessen erosion. Haven't you seen erosion around the lake?
.
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
I disagree with you, NH. 150' from shore is to lessen erosion and stop boats from rocking among other things. Do you think they care if we hit a rock?
WHL- Admin
- Posts : 6057
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-01-14
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
WHL wrote:I disagree with you, NH. 150' from shore is to lessen erosion and stop boats from rocking among other things. Do you think they care if we hit a rock?
This is news to me, and I read all the NH boater's guides.
Erosion is only mentioned in-passing, below where milfoil is a problem.
One interesting factoid (in the guide) is that if you're located in a bay or cove that's 1000' across (or less), every powerboat has to proceed at "Headway Speed".
BTW: I saw no patrolling NHMP boats Saturday or Sunday.
.
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
I was told that by a MP one time-about the 1000 feet across. He was referring to jet skiis saying they really couldn't go full speed in places like that, but of course they do. Wish I could remember why it applies to jet skiis especially. No one knows about that law so it is never followed.
WHL- Admin
- Posts : 6057
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-01-14
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
Unfortunately the NHMP took a budget hit. We all want services but not all pay for them or want toNews Hawk wrote:WHL wrote:I disagree with you, NH. 150' from shore is to lessen erosion and stop boats from rocking among other things. Do you think they care if we hit a rock?
This is news to me, and I read all the NH boater's guides.
Erosion is only mentioned in-passing, below where milfoil is a problem.
One interesting factoid (in the guide) is that if you're located in a bay or cove that's 1000' across (or less), every powerboat has to proceed at "Headway Speed".
BTW: I saw no patrolling NHMP boats Saturday or Sunday.
.
red_hill- Posts : 303
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
I wonder if this was the same MP Officer that I read about a few years ago that claimed boats within 3 FOOTBALL FIELD LENGTHS of each other must travel headway speed, Of course the law is 150 feet and since a football field is 100 yards, or 300 feet, plus the end zones the MP Officer was saying any vessel within 900 feet of each other must travel at headway speed.Post WHL Today at 7:19 am
I was told that by a MP one time-about the 1000 feet across. He was referring to jet skiis saying they really couldn't go full speed in places like that, but of course they do. Wish I could remember why it applies to jet skiis especially. No one knows about that law so it is never followed.
This seems consistent with the MP officer's incorrect interpretation of the law that he told you about.
I saw two on Saturday. Red_Hill is correct. Since the MP became part of the State Police and is now taxpayer funded rather than funded through boat registration fees, the division has taken a big hit in its budget.News Hawk
BTW: I saw no patrolling NHMP boats Saturday or Sunday.
obervantone- Posts : 717
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-04-10
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
I don't miss a heavier presence. When they patrolled more, boats passed us as we were going slow, 25 feet away from us, right in front of MP and they didn't get stopped. So I think we are doing just fine as we are. If someone needs them, we can always call them.
WHL- Admin
- Posts : 6057
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-01-14
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
While that is true, the downside of that argument is that if the only Patrol boat operational at the time of need is in or around Glendale...or worse, it is hanging around the no wake zone at the the Weirs on the Paugus Bay side and it is needed say in Moultonboro, how long do you think it will take to get it there?WHL
I don't miss a heavier presence. When they patrolled more, boats passed us as we were going slow, 25 feet away from us, right in front of MP and they didn't get stopped. So I think we are doing just fine as we are. If someone needs them, we can always call them.
obervantone- Posts : 717
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-04-10
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
Well, you have to weigh the expense against the convenience and I am willing to sacrifice to save a little money. Just commenting to the above post by red.
WHL- Admin
- Posts : 6057
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-01-14
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
WHL wrote:I don't miss a heavier presence. When they patrolled more, boats passed us as we were going slow, 25 feet away from us, right in front of MP and they didn't get stopped. So I think we are doing just fine as we are. If someone needs them, we can always call them.
What number do you call?
The last few times they were needed, I got an answering machine (usual local NHMP #). Once early in the morning, there was a long delay before the State Police answered. The State Police said to call Wolfeboro Police!
After I gave the WPD all the details of the drunks in the middle of Winter Harbor, I said, "Don't call me back"! Fifteen minutes later, they called back, and said they couldn't find my house!
.
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
I don't call them but they used to be in the phone book. That number doesn't work?
WHL- Admin
- Posts : 6057
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-01-14
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
They couldn't find your house because they know who you are and know that you complain too much.
whiteman- Guest
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
Last time I called, the NHMP local number (mid-day), I got a recording and left a message. When I called their toll-free (877) number, I got the State Police, who said to call WPD.WHL wrote:I don't call them but they used to be in the phone book. That number doesn't work?
The NHMP does have a night-time squad, but if you call after 10 or so, they have a call-out officer, who gets rousted out of bed. (Blizzard case).
While that doesn't make sense, I only ask that they do the job they're paid to do—as any taxpayer would. If there's a better LEO job in New Hampshire, I don't know what that might be.whiteman wrote:They couldn't find your house because they know who you are and know that you complain too much.
One NHMP Sergeant stopped by at my request—after a complaint—and agreed with what I had to say. My request (through his efforts) to ride with them nights was approved, but I never followed up. I was hoping to see how their radar worked against speeders after dark, when the NHMP couldn't be so readily identified.
I did get some back-talk from one male NHMP dispatcher, but the officer was on his way and had arrived just as I was about to hang up.
.
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
I believe that since the NH State Police took control of the NHMP that emergency calls before and after normal business hours (8:15am to 4:15pm Mon-Fri) go through the SP switchboard further increasing the delay in a response to an emergency. Rather than a call to 911 that will end up being transferred all over the place, I'd first try hailing them on VHF 16.
So in my question regarding an emergency response, if you factor in the switchboard issues, it could be the better part of an hour before a Marine Patrol boat on Paugus Bay could get the call and arrive on scene in Moultonboro. That is short sighted especially when dealing with an emergency. Someone will eventually be critically hurt or worse because of the current set up.
You've all heard the phrase "penny wise and pound foolish" This is a perfect example.
So in my question regarding an emergency response, if you factor in the switchboard issues, it could be the better part of an hour before a Marine Patrol boat on Paugus Bay could get the call and arrive on scene in Moultonboro. That is short sighted especially when dealing with an emergency. Someone will eventually be critically hurt or worse because of the current set up.
You've all heard the phrase "penny wise and pound foolish" This is a perfect example.
obervantone- Posts : 717
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-04-10
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
obervantone wrote:You've all heard the phrase "penny wise and pound foolish" This is a perfect example.
Even a twenty-minute NHMP response is too late on the water. Be ready to rescue—like my family (and I) did last season.
.
NOT the "Unmarked" NHMP Boats...
An actual NHMP boat passed by today. At first, I thought it was a regular center-console outboard, with two aboard. Interestingly, it wasn't colored like the others, but it was marked like the other NHMP boats.
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
One was in the day before in the afternoon. It looked like he checked a mooring.
WHL- Admin
- Posts : 6057
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-01-14
Re: Not ONE—But TWO—NHMPs in Winter Harbor Today...
It is a big lake. Absent 5-6 boats running on Winni alone, 20 minutes would be quick. If it were medical, the local FD will likely be longer.News Hawk wrote:obervantone wrote:You've all heard the phrase "penny wise and pound foolish" This is a perfect example.
Even a twenty-minute NHMP response is too late on the water. Be ready to rescue—like my family (and I) did last season.
.
red_hill- Posts : 303
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2013-02-01
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
» Let the invasion of Winter Harbor begin!
» Two Racers in Winter Harbor So Far This Week...
» "Visitor" Invades Quiet Winter Harbor...
» Fireworks on Winter Harbor Celebrating July 15th?
» NHMP and Wolfeboro Fire/Rescue Called to Winter Harbor...
» Two Racers in Winter Harbor So Far This Week...
» "Visitor" Invades Quiet Winter Harbor...
» Fireworks on Winter Harbor Celebrating July 15th?
» NHMP and Wolfeboro Fire/Rescue Called to Winter Harbor...
Page 1 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum