Voter fraud

obervantone wrote:Still waiting for News Hawk to contact the FBI regarding those 29,000 fraudulent votes in New Hampshire that he and his source "know" happened because otherwise he never would have posted anything that he wasn't certain was the truth would he?

News Hawk
It's been estimated that Republicans have to overcome 6+ percent of fraudulent votes to defeat the Democrats

obervantone wrote:As we can all see you made NO mention of Virginia.  You issued a very clear straight forward blanket statement: Extrapolating that 6+ percent across the board means more than 29,000 votes in New Hampshire were fraudulent.  Been in touch with the FBI yet?

News Hawk
   

obervantone wrote:As we can all see you made NO mention of Virginia.  You issued a very clear straight forward blanket statement: Extrapolating that 6+ percent across the board means more than 29,000 votes in New Hampshire were fraudulent.  Been in touch with the FBI yet?

All by yourself, you've extrapolated, and then extrapolated on that. That's a "Straw Argument".

I have one FBI friend here, and another active in a professional organization. I've contacted both from time to time (including 9/11 and a day or two before the FBI botched the Davidian raid), but I won't waste their time with your "gleanings".

Section 1001 makes it a crime to "knowingly and willfully" give false statements in any matter under federal jurisdiction.  Defendants convicted under Section 1001 face a maximum of five years in prison and up to $250,000 in criminal fines

obervantone wrote:

News Hawk
   

obervantone wrote:As we can all see you made NO mention of Virginia.  You issued a very clear straight forward blanket statement: Extrapolating that 6+ percent across the board means more than 29,000 votes in New Hampshire were fraudulent.  Been in touch with the FBI yet?

All by yourself, you've extrapolated, and then extrapolated on that. That's a "Straw Argument".

I have one FBI friend here, and another active in a professional organization. I've contacted both from time to time (including 9/11 and a day or two before the FBI botched the Davidian raid), but I won't waste their time with your "gleanings".

Once again you can not support your own statements.  You introduced the idea that over 6 percent of the mid-term election involved voter fraud.  All I did was extrapolate 6 percent that you claim were fraudulent from the votes cast in NH.  Based on YOUR statement over 29,000 votes in the New Hampshire mid-term election were fraudulent.

Gee, what a surprise, you won't bring your impeccable research to the FBI to bring these destroyers of democracy to justice.

Of course the bottom line why you are not going after those "scofflaws" stealing our democracy by giving the FBI your "evidence" of 6+ percent of the votes in the mid-terms being fraudulent is this:

Section 1001 makes it a crime to "knowingly and willfully" give false statements in any matter under federal jurisdiction.  Defendants convicted under Section 1001 face a maximum of five years in prison and up to $250,000 in criminal fines

 
Just more fabricated Bull Shit.

News Hawk
There's strong support for voter fraud besides estimations in critical elections—of which, Mid-Terms are not.

Six+% could be made of the following chart. Maybe you overlooked this graphic on this thread's page one:

ev·i·dence
/ˈevədəns/
noun: evidence
the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

obervantone wrote:
"...There are non-critical elections...?  

News Hawk
While voters put many Republicans into office this year, that could change in just two years, erasing any good they might have planned.

Presidential elections have much greater gravitas.

Richmond, VA–Merely hours after the close of a bitter and divisive Governor’s race in Virginia that saw Democrat Terry McAuliffe pull out a win over Republican Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, irregularities in voting data have emerged.  According to mainstream media outlets McAuliffe supposedly defeated Cuccinelli in a razor-thin 47-46 percent victory to become the next Governor of the great state of Virginia.

Immediately following the announcement, Cuccinelli’s office opened a full investigation into the legitimacy of the vote and quickly turned up surprising results.  In 13 districts, multiple instances of intimidation at the polls were reported.  Large black men wearing traditional Black Panther garb were reported lingering around polling places approaching older voters asking questions about who they intended on voting for.  In Loudoun and Fairfax counties (traditional Democratic strongholds), election officials withheld submitting voter data in order to get an idea of whether to count absentee ballots or not.  In an audit of the voter registration information, it quickly became apparent that MULTIPLE votes were cast by people who were either deceased or had long ago moved out of the district.

According to exit polling Cuccinelli won the race by big margins reaching a high percent of the key voting blocks of women, Latinos and Blacks.

Cuccinelli was a target of large amounts of out of state financing as the Democrats set out to make the race be a referendum against the Tea Party movement.  McAuliffe got a late boost from Bill and Hillary Clinton, as well as Joe Biden, who campaigned hard for the Democrat.

Even in defeat Cuccinelli reminded voters that the election was in fact a referendum against President Obama’s Affordable Care Act.  “Despite being outspent by an unprecedented $15 million,” he said, ”this race came down to the wire because of Obamacare. That message will go out across America tonight.”

Sources within Cuccinelli’s office have warned that “this is not over” and that Ken will be challenging the results of the election in court.
http://federalistpress.com/evidence-of-widespread-voter-fraud-found-in-virginia-governors-race.php

News Hawk
I think you're trying to send me on a "Fool's Errand". How can I provide "facts" in contests controlled by electronic voting machines?

News Buzzard wrote:"...What's the matter? Did Obama kick sand in your face with his Immigration order? His popularity with Hispanics is only up to 68%!